![]()
Evaluation Criteria

Manuscripts submitted to journals under Rubatosis Global Publications are assessed against defined academic and ethical standards to ensure the publication of high-quality, reliable, and impactful research.
The work should present new findings, insights, or perspectives that contribute meaningfully to the existing body of knowledge. Redundant or previously published content is not acceptable.
Research design, experimental procedures, and analytical methods must be appropriate, clearly described, and scientifically valid to support reproducibility.
Data should be accurate, properly analyzed, and presented without manipulation. Statistical or analytical approaches must be suitable and correctly applied.
The manuscript should be logically structured, clearly written, and free from ambiguity. Figures, tables, and references must support the narrative effectively.
Submissions must align with the aims and scope of the journal and demonstrate significance within the relevant academic or professional field.
Research involving human participants, animals, or sensitive data must comply with recognized ethical standards and include appropriate approvals and consent statements.
Relevant and recent literature should be appropriately cited. References must be accurate, properly formatted, and contribute to the context of the study.
The manuscript should maintain professional academic language. Grammar, syntax, and formatting must meet publication standards.
Any use of AI-assisted technologies must be disclosed. AI should not compromise originality, data accuracy, or intellectual responsibility.



